Download PDF A Critical Review of Legal Capacity Reform in the US
A Critical Review of Legal Capacity Reform in the US
Kristin Booth Glen - A Critical Review of Legal Capacity Reform in the US
Kristin Booth Glen - A Critical Review of Legal Capacity Reform in the US
Cathy E. Costanzo, Kristin Booth Glen, Anna M. Krieger
Download PDF Supported Decision-Making: Lessons from Pilot Projects
Elizabeth Moran
This articles raises—and begins too answer—questions about how to provide the accommodations, including acceptance of SDM, that enable people with I/DD and older people with dementia, etc. to participate in court proceedings on an equal basis with others as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Something to Talk About: Supported Decision-Making and Access to Justice for All
Nina A. Kohn, Jeremy A. Blumenthal & Amy T. Campbell
The law has traditionally responded to cognitive disability by authorizing surrogate decision-makers to make decisions on behalf of disabled individuals. However, supported decision-making, an alternative paradigm for addressing cognitive disability, is rapidly gaining political support. According to its proponents, supported decision-making empowers individuals with cognitive challenges by ensuring that they are the ultimate decision-maker but are provided support from one or more others, giving them the assistance they need to make decisions for themselves.
Download PDF Supported Decision-Making: A Viable Alternative to Guardianship
Michael (Mickey) Schindler and Meytal Segal-Reich
Megan Wright
In the absence of an substantial empirical work on the use of SDM with older persons with cognitive decline and dementia, this article offers insights into the discussions about standards of substitute decision-making by healthcare providers on behalf of their patients with dementia.
Download PDF Dementia, Autonomy, and Supported Healthcare Decisionmaking
Terry Carney & Fleur Beaupert
The article discusses how, particularly in Australia where, state or public functions have contracted in recent decades, the balance between public law, private law and civil society has impacted efforts to advance SDM.
Robert Dinerstein, Esme Grant Grewal, Jonathan Martinis
The article explores the recent history of guardianship in international law, culminating in the CRPD, and developments that have occurred both in the U.S. and abroad “as a result of international diplomacy and discourse.”
Arlene S. Kanter
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA), originally enacted in 1975, has, as its purpose to “provide a free appropriate public education” to children with disabilities and to prepare them for further education, employment, and full participation in society. This article presents the view that guardianship as part of the transition planning process for young adults with I/DD undermines the language and purpose of the IDEIA.
Kristin Booth Glen
This article follows the earlier “Piloting Personhood” to describe the accomplishments of SDMNY over its first four years, and discusses what has been learned in order to make SDM an effective and viable practice with integrity.
Dana Dimant
This article describes Israel’s adoption of SDM legislation, and includes a mother’s experience with a the Bizchut Supported Decision-Making pilot
Download PDF Amendment to the Legal Capacity and Guardianship Law in Israel (2016)
Kristin Booth Glen
Locating personhood within the human right of legal capacity, the article describes some of the lessons SDMNY learned in the first year of its experiment in implementing legal capacity through SDM.
This and other articles published as part of the Cardozo Law Review’s issue on its 2017 legal personhood symposium are also available.
Kristin Booth Glen
The Article describes the human rights regime inspired by the CRPD and calls for a paradigm shift in how we view people with ID, from inquiry into what a person cannot do, to supports necessary to enable her/him to make her/his own decisions, and the legal efforts necessary to ensure that such decisions are recognized by public and private third parties.
Tara Anne Pleat, Edward V. Wilcenski & Katy Carpenter
Tara Anne Pleat, an SDMNY Advisory Council member, explains some of the issues and controversies surrounding guardianship law and practice with regard to persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) in New York State under Article 17-A of the Surrogate’s Court Procedures Act.
Reprinted with permission from: Health Law Journal, Fall 2018, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207.
Download PDF Overview of Guardianship for Individuals with ID (2018)
Dohn Hoyle
The author, a former Director of ARC of Michigan and long time disability rights advocate reflects that few recurring problems have been as vexing as the pervasive use of and blind acceptance of guardianship which he describes as both “disconcerting” and “for persons with a history of being oppressed,… unconscionable.”
Kathy Brill
The author, mother of a 28 year old daughter with special needs describes her personal decision not to seek guardianship, and discusses how families should consider SDM as an important means to their children’s future independence.
Download PDF SDM & Alternatives to Guardianship by Families (2017)