search expand
Skip to content
SDMNY
  • Home
  • About
    • What is Supported Decision-Making?
    • Where does Supported Decision-Making come from?
      • How we all make decisions
      • Supported Decision-Making and Human Rights
    • Supported Decision-Making as an alternative to guardianship
    • Court recognition of Supported Decision-Making
    • Supported Decision-Making and education
    • Supported Decision-Making and other vulnerable groups
  • SDMNY Pilot Project
    • History and Approach
    • How we do it
      • The 3-phase facilitation model
      • The Supported Decision-Making Agreement (SDMA)
      • Facilitators and Mentors
      • Resolving Disputes
    • Who we are
      • Advisory Council
      • Staff
    • Independent evaluations
    • Funders
  • Legislation
    • Why We Need SDMA Legislation
    • What SDMNY’s experience can contribute to SDMA legislation
    • Principles for Supported Decision-Making Agreement (SDMA) Legislation
    • SDMA legislation in the US and elsewhere
      • Supported Decision-Making agreement laws in the US
      • Supported Decision-Making agreement laws around the world
  • Stories
    • Decision-Makers
    • Parents and guardians
    • Supporters
    • Facilitators
  • Who Supports SDM?
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Court Decisions
    • Entities Supporting SDM
    • Evaluations
    • Good News from SDMNY
    • Links
    • Reports
    • SDMA Laws
    • Videos
  • News
Resources
Type: Articles

Supported Decision-Making from Theory to Practice: Further Reflection on an Intentional Pilot Project

Kristin Booth Glen

This article follows the earlier “Piloting Personhood” to describe the accomplishments of SDMNY over its first four years, and discusses what has been learned in order to make SDM an effective and viable practice with integrity.  

Download PDF Supported Decision-Making from Theory to Practice: Further Reflection on an Intentional Pilot Project

SDMNY
  • Old site
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Contact
© 2021 SDMNY